Singing fish billboard. Cute or annoying?

Here’s something a bit different. Put a whole lot of wall-mounted fish together and get them to sing in an outdoor ad on a busy street.

Created by Grey Paris for frozen fish company Findus, the 25 wall-mounted fish are activated by a motion detector and break out into KC and the Sunshine Band’s disco ditty, “Shake Your Booty”.
It’s been placed in a high-traffic area in Paris, so you’d imagine that the singing fish have got their work cut out for them.
I think it’s a cute idea and something a bit different for outdoor – though it surely wouldn’t have been cheap to make and operate.
But it seems not everyone’s sold, with one blogger dubbing it “quite possibly one of the most annoying billboards ever erected”.

See original article here

Posted in Branding, Strategy | Leave a comment

46 cool vintage ads

Take a look at the way advertising used to be.

Many of these advertisements would not make it past an organisations legal department today.

The art of long text writing is also lost in our new fast paced world. Stop and read the text on some of these ads, and be taken back to a more gentler and innocent time.










































See original article here

Posted in Design | Leave a comment

The tablet wars – Apple vs Samsung

The explosion of tablet computers since the launch of the iPad has been phenomenal with an estimated 67 million tablets sold in 2011.

The biggest war is happening between Apple and Samsung, with both companies spending plenty of time in courts around the world counter suing each other.

An interesting observation has been how both have been marketing their product.

Apple’s advertisement is inspirational and emotional. It doesn’t mention any of the iPads features (or what it lacks) as with Samsung wants to spell it out.

Watch the ads and tell us what you think.

Posted in Branding, Strategy | Leave a comment

The true partnership: How to get great design solutions

AIGA Member Contribution by Marcy Rye
January 26, 2012.

Last night I went to an AIGA meeting featuring a panel of design industry leaders in Los Angeles. The panel’s focus was on the future of design in 2012 and how it might be changing with new technologies, social media and other dramatic cultural shifts such as the loss of Steve Jobs.

A theme that emerged was on the nature of the designer/client relationship as panelists talked about their own firms and how they interact with their clients. It supported and informed something I’ve been thinking about for a long time, which is how to transform this relationship into something that lets us, as designers, truly help our clients to solve problems.

The relationship a client has with your design team is possibly the key factor in the type and quality of the work that emerges. There are three types of relationships I’ve noticed over the years that I’ll name “boss/worker”, “friends”, and “partners.”

The boss/worker situation is when the client knows exactly what they want from the design and provides specific, detailed direction to the designer. “We need a brochure for the conference that needs to look exactly like this.” Direction will include details such as the specific placement of content elements in relation to each other, colors to use, relative sizes of elements, etc. Essentially, the client is designing the piece and the designer is simply executing the client’s vision.

In a friends relationship the client understands their brand, and has specific goals in mind they want to achieve, such as “create a brochure to hand out at the conference.” In this case direction will be more hands-off. The client will want to be sure the brand is maintained, may provide complete copy and images, but overall wants the designer to use their professional judgment as to how to arrange the various elements, relative sizes, colors, etc.

In a partners relationship, something very different starts to happen. Here, the client and designer discuss the larger context and history of the organization and its communications (sometimes across multiple media), business and marketing goals, and personal goals of stakeholders. Specific problems are identified, such as “we need to attract attention to our product at the conference.” Priorities are established, such as “It’s more important that people remember our name than that they understand every detail of what we do.” Here the designer and client work closely together to identify design solutions to the problem. In our conference example the solution may end up being a brochure, or it may end up being something far more creative that truly does attract significant attention to the product at the conference and make the client’s name extremely memorable.

Working together as partners is clearly where real problem solving in design can start to happen. To achieve this relationship both sides must practice truthfulness, transparency, and teaching.

  • Truthfulness: What this means is—in communications, be honest. If something doesn’t work, speak up and discuss why. Work together as a team to understand the problem and to fix it. Designers should take this as a call to help educate clients as to why we do things the way we do, why we deserve to get paid for our work (no spec work!), and why design is an effective way to solve communication problems. Clients should take this as a call to inform designers about their real goals and what they’re really trying to accomplish. Normally the goal is not simply “create a brochure.” The real goal is “inform people about our business.”
  • Transparency: Don’t be secretive. If you’re having a problem with the work or the process, share that information and again work together to fix it. Designers should take this to mean that if you’re stuck, speak up or ask questions. Or if something is going to affect the budget—let the client know right away and discuss options. Clients should be forthcoming with budgets to let designers help strategize the best solution within the available budget, and should make designers aware of realities of timelines, approval processes, etc.
  • Teaching: This, I think, is the most important part of the relationship. Both sides should be teaching each other. Designers can teach clients about the design process, and help clients understand how design can solve their business problem. Clients can teach designers about their business, its context, goals, priorities, and problems to be solved. When designers and clients come together on this the knowledge and experience of each combines into something greater than the sum of the parts, and opens the door for innovation and inspiration. Teaching well also means listening — to understand points of confusion or objections or new ideas — and so this becomes a two-way street of open communications.

I believe in the power of partnership and of open, two-way communications. When I work on projects with clients where there’s a true partnership relationship we accomplish truly great work, and it’s work that works … it solves problems, it helps goals become a reality, and ultimately it helps us and our clients to grow together.

See original article here

Posted in Design | Leave a comment

Abstract sports

FADU Logo, Before and After

Established in 1990, FADU (Federação Académica do Desporto Universitário, Academic Federation of University Sports in English) is an organization in Portugal focused on sports as a tool of educational development. It acts like a less carnivorous version of the NCAA by organizing events and enabling communication between higher education students, almost 7,000 of them, across all possible sports from soccer to basketball to chess to bridge among 25 total activities. A new identity has been created by Braga, Portugal-based Gen Design Studio.

FADU

FADU

More sketches here.

FADU

FADU

FADU

FADU

FADU

Sample of divisions. You can see all here.

FADU

The old logo was so quirky it went past bad and back to good in a way that hip Dutch designers wish they could pull off every day. But, yeah, it’s a good thing it’s being replaced. Especially with such a well thought out and superbly executed new logo. Constructed from abstractions of different motions from each sport, the “U” shape logo looks like a medallion of sorts and comes across as bold and simple, despite its internal intricacy. Unlike another “U”-shaped logo made out of a bunch of stuff — hello Unilever — this one is harder to decode as all of its parts are cropped, coming to full view only when the logo changes slightly to include the complete piece, giving the identity a constant changing shape and breaking out of what could become boring symmetry. I’m not a big fan of the typography, from the type choice, Mic 32, to the way it’s used so small in the divisions. But that’s a really minor complaint against one of the best flexible icons we’ve seen all year.

FADU

FADU

FADU

see original post here

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Carlsberg stunt

You gather 148 bikers into a cinema and leave only two seats in the middle available. This provides us with great footage of unexpecting couples who buy the tickets for these two free spots. Do they make the right choice and leave? Or is it the right choice to gather all their courage and take place between these bad boys? Watch and see.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Osaka Station water printer

This amazing water art/technology that operates as a clock and a water dot matrix printer is making a splash at the Osaka Station in Osaka city in Japan.

Posted in Design | Leave a comment